A „substantial violation” is when you get something different from what was stated in the agreement. Suppose your company contracts with a supplier to provide 200 copies of a related manual for an automotive industry conference. But when the boxes arrive at the meeting place, they contain garden brochures. If a condition of your contract has been breached, you may be able to terminate the contract by „refusal” and claim damages for the damage suffered. If the infringement is a violation of the warranty, damages are the only damages. Other means of breach of contract are when the contract is fraudulent, when the contract is illegal or unacceptable, and when there is an error of fact in the terms of the contract. The parties may also provide clear conditions for their respective contracts, indicating when a party`s actions may be considered offences. Suppose you terminate a contract. They say there was a violation.
The intention to execute a contract in a manner inconsistent with the terms of the contract also shows the intention not to execute the contract.  Whether such conduct is so serious that it is a means of renunciation depends on the opposition of the difference in performance that threatens. The intention to achieve results is effective, but willingness in this context does not mean the desire to act despite the inability to do so. Say, „I`d like, but I can`t” negative intent as much as „I`m not going.”  Contracting parties must strictly execute contracts on their terms: this is what was agreed in the first place when the contract was concluded. There is therefore a need for further offences. Really, all the innocent party has to do is say that the treaty is over. Communication can be done by behavior. In some cases, it was enough not to react to The Correspondence. If, in the example above, the contractor had been informed of using copper pipes, and had used iron pipes that would not have lasted as long as the copper pipes would have lasted, the owner can recover the cost of the actual correction of the rupture – remove the iron pipes and replace them with copper pipes. This describes the situation when a person is able to say that the contract is broken before it is actually violated.
A party is able to avoid an anticipated infringement when it is clear that other contracting parties will not terminate the agreement within a specified time frame. These classifications merely describe how a contract can be breached, not the seriousness of the offence.