The TPP text was the result of 500 official U.S. trade advisors representing corporate interests, who participated in years of closed-door negotiations, while public opinion, the press and Congress were locked out. China expressed concern about the pact and saw a potential threat as the United States tried to intensify relations with its Asian trading partners. At the same time, the agreement provided some cover to China by pursuing its own trade agreements in the region, such as the Silk Road Initiative in Central Asia. Both the extension of the concept of copyright and the non-complaint-free provision (i.e., competent authorities can take legal action without the need to file a formal complaint) have failed in Japan because they were so controversial.  At the beginning of 2015 „a group of artists, archivists, academics and activists … Japan [asked] its negotiators to oppose the TPP requirements that would require their country and five of the 11 other nations negotiating the secret agreement to extend their copyright rules to respect the already excessive length of U.S. copyright.  However, the final agreement establishes a clause of copyright that corresponds to that obtained under U.S. law – the life of the author plus 70 years. A version of the treaty text „subject to legal review” was published by potential contracting parties on 5 November 2015.  Parts of the draft comprehensive agreements have been disclosed to the public in advance.  Many of the provisions contained in the leaked documents are imbued with previous trade agreements.
[Citation required] Some critics and even supporters of the TPP wanted the agreement to contain measures against nations involved in alleged currency manipulation, particularly against China.  Daniel Drezner, a professor of international politics at Tufts University, argued, however, that the trade agreement would never involve restrictions on monetary manipulation because it would have limited U.S. monetary policy.  Harvard economist Jeffrey Frankel argued that the inclusion of the language of monetary manipulation in the TPP would be a mistake.  Frankel noted that monetary manipulation would be difficult to implement (in part because it cannot be said whether a currency is overvalued or undervalued); „monetary manipulation” can often be legitimate; China, often referred to as a major monetary manipulator, is not involved in the TPP; Accusations of monetary manipulation are often worthless; and because it would limit U.S. monetary policy.  The pact aimed to deepen economic relations between these nations, reduce tariffs and promote trade in order to stimulate growth. Members had also hoped to promote closer relations with economic policy and regulation. PolitiFact considers President Obama`s assertion that the Trans-Pacific Partnership „has a country like Malaysia that is really making serious efforts to combat human trafficking.”  PolitiFact notes that in June 2015, Malaysia began complying with the TPP and amending its legislation to improve the treatment of victims of human trafficking.  Among the amendments, Malaysia has granted victims better access to public shelter, transitional housing and more victim-friendly restitution procedures.  Malaysia has also taken steps to end human trafficking in the construction industry.
 Supporters said it would have been a blessing for all the nations involved – „unlocking opportunities” and „tackling the important problems of the 21st century in the global economy” – and argued that it had been written in a way to encourage more countries, perhaps even China, to register.